Attributes of U.S. Public Media Newsrooms: Overview

Abstract: Using survey research from 2010-2012, the author describes in unprecedented detail the capacity and practices of local public media newsrooms. His survey work provides staffing, budgeting and programming patterns.…

Abstract:
Using survey research from 2010-2012, the author describes in unprecedented detail the capacity and practices of local
public media newsrooms. His survey work provides staffing, budgeting and
programming patterns. It also provides an initial baseline from which to track emerging trends in
local public media news. This installment provides an overview. It is derived from a presentation to the Broadcast Education Association in April 2013.

Public
Media News Staffing

The
census of journalists found 3222 people are
paid to create the local news you get from public media stations. Radio employs the largest share of these news people.


2010 CPB Staff by Station Type.001Below is another
look at the same data… only this compares full time local news workers to the part timers… and the
contractors. Almost two thirds of the journalists are
full time employees.

2010 CPB Staff Type x Station Type.001

Seventy-five percent of the journalists in public media are employed by 25% of the stations. The chart below sorts newsrooms by “weight class” — a schema created by the author as a way to talk about news room sizes. On the
left are the featherweights, newsrooms of 1 full time or less. Over half the
stations have newsrooms in the featherweight class. As the newsrooms get bigger, we have
fewer of them, but more journalists employed. A third of all local public media journalists are from the middle weight newsrooms.

2011 Journalists by Weight Class.001

Evidence of Newsroom Growth

Having only just established our baseline measurement of newsroom employment, we can’t yet say by what increments they are changing. However, we have general trend information indicating they have been growing every year from 2010 to 2013.

The chart below — from the 2010 newsroom survey — shows that more than a fourth of all public media stations saw actual growth in 2010 or predicted growth in 2011 in their local newsrooms.

2010-2011 Staff Change.001
Similarly, only more robustly, the same question in the 2012 survey showed both actual growth in 2012 and projected growth in 2013.

2012-2013 Staff Change.001

Local Public Media Journalists by Primary and Secondary Roles

What
do those local journalists do?  Here is how their primary roles sort out systemwide. Note the very small slice that are tasked with online duties. Also note the
rather small slice devoted to editing.

2010 CPB Primary Roles.001

In the majority of newsrooms, people have to wear two hats. Below is the distribution of these secondary roles. Again, the online role is a small slice.  The
editing slice gets bigger when it comes to being a secondary role.

2010 CPB Secondary Roles.001
Most Local Journalists Have Online Duties

While online workers were a very small part of the local public media news force, that is not to say that stations weren’t tasking their people with online responsibilities. The data below, from 2010, show most local news workers (62%) share online duties with
their broadcast duties.  So online is a
big part of the picture…  as stations migrate from the broadcast platform to the digital platform. Many people have a foot in both areas.

2010 CPB Platform Roles.001
Local On Air News Content

The following charts were taken from the 2012 survey of local public media newsrooms. They assess the degree of “commitment of resources” to various broadcast news programming types.

The patterns found were similar to those found in 2010. (The 2010 radio breakout can be found here. The methodology used was slightly different, but the general trends are comparable.)

The most commonly supported news content was the newscast. (This is driven by radio. Few public TV stations commit to local newscasts.)

2012 MVM All Newscasts.001
Next, in terms of common commitment, is the staple of local news coverage: the news feature.

2012 MVM All Features.001
Some say public media doesn’t cover breaking news. But that’s not true. This category of content seems to be gaining station commitment.

2012 MVM All Breaking News.001
Local news talk shows show a high commitment from more than a third of public media stations.

2012 MVM All Talk Shows.001
Local radio and TV news magazines are resource intensive. Not of lot of stations can commit to them.

2012 MVM All Magazine.001
Even more resource intensive is the local news documentary. Well over half of stations show minimal commitment to making documentaries:

2012 MVM All Documentary.001
While local stations are seeking more ways to engage their communities, it would appear that conducting on air town hall meetings is not the way to go for most.

2012 MVM All Town Hall Meetings.001
Likewise, producing local news commentaries is anathema to the vast majority of stations.

2012 MVM All Commentary.001

Local On Air News Time Increasing

Earlier we showed evidence of stations growing their local news staffing. Below, we see that stations are also increasing the amount of air time devoted to local news.

2010-2012 Air Time Change Past.001

Local Online News Content

What types of online news content are local stations offering?

These charts are from the 2012 survey of local public media newsrooms. They are presented in order from most common to least common online content types.

Online audio gets high commitment. Not surprising given our radio-dominant sample.

2012 MVM All AUDIO.001
Text is the predominant news vehicle online. It ranks highly among local stations.

2012 MVM All TEXT.001

Facebook ranks as a high commitment among a third of stations… and as a medium commitment from another third of stations.

2012 MVM All FACEBOOK.001
Similarly, Twitter showed significant commitment by local newsrooms. Comparied to 2010 (not shown), Twitter showed a significant increase in local station prevalence.

2012 MVM All TWITTER.001
Use of photos in local online news? More medium commitment than high commitment.

2012 MVM All PHOTOS.001
At this point, there’s a rather big drop off in the online efforts of local public media stations.

More than half of stations give low commitment to online comments.

2012 MVM All COMMENTS.001
Even fewer lean in the direction of blogging.

2012 MVM All BLOGGING.001
While video is considered very appealing to online users, local public media are generally uncommitted to video in local online news.

2012 MVM All VIDEO.001
Maps, too, are unlikely to be found in the online offerings of local public media newsrooms.

2012 MVM All MAPS.001
One more. User-generated content is among the least likely content forms to be found in local public media news.

2012 MVM All UGC.001

Increasing Local Online News Quantity

The 2012 local news survey shows how widely stations are stepping up their online offerings.

This chart looks at online growth for the year 2012. Over half the stations increased their online news quantity.

2010-2012 Online Change Past.001
The chart that follows shows the percentage of stations planning to increase local online news in 2013 is roughly two-thirds.

2010-2012 Online Change Future.001
Station Satisfaction with On Air and Online Local News

When asked to evaluate their local news according to NPR standards, almost two-thirds of stations were satisfied or very satisfied with what they were putting on their broadcast transmitters.

2012 Satisfaction On Air.001
However, much of that satisfaction turned to dissatisfaction when the same question was applied to online news content. Only a third of stations are satisfied or very satisfied with their online news.

2012 Satisfaction Online.001
Analysis

Questions about the capacity and capabilities of local public radio and television newsrooms is of national, timely significance. In light of harsh media disruption, there have been numerous calls for public media to step up and serve the information needs of local communities (Knight Commission 2009) (Downie & Schudson 2009) (Cochran 2010).

Public media is trying to respond to the call. Prevalent thinking emphasizes local (and national) public service journalism (SRG 2010) (Kling 2011). The Corporation for Public Broadcasting has invested widely in such efforts as Local Journalism Centers, Localore, NCME, a local ethics project and the “Public Media Platform” for digital distribution. Moreover, professional membership groups like PRNDI, PRPD, DEI and others are emphasizing local news funding and training projects.

The data here provide a baseline by which we can eventually compare the future to the past. It also indicates where the present action is.

We see positive signs. Stations are growing their local news ranks. They are adding local news programming. And they are really pushing for more local news online.

But we can also see that the response has been uneven. The bulk of the local journalism efforts have come from radio stations. The heavy lifting is getting done by the larger newsrooms. And there remains a big gap between what’s happening on-air and what’s happening online.

About the Data

The information here is drawn from four primary sources:

2010 Census of
Journalists
(CPB/PRNDI 2010) – The first ever attempt to count every
journalist in local U.S. public radio and TV stations, as certified by the Corporation
for Public Broadcasting. The study was sponsored by CPB, contracted to Public
Radio News Directors Inc., and conducted by Michael V. Marcotte with help from
Steve Martin and Ken Mills. This online, invitation-only survey reached 516
public media organizations (89% of the target universe of 576 organizations). Data used by permission of CPB.

2010 Supplemental Survey
of Stations
(MVM/PRNDI 2010) – A survey run by Michael V. Marcotte, in
partnership with PRNDI. This online survey was optional for those filing the
2010 Census of Journalists and reached 397 organizations.

2011 Station Activity
Survey
(CPB 2011) – The annual data collection survey conducted by CPB in
conjunction with its community service grant process. Included here is a new
(and voluntary) section to begin regular tabulation of local news personnel. 504
organizations participated.

2012 Survey of
Stations
(MVM/UNR/USC 2012) – A survey run by MVM Consulting in
coordination with the University of Nevada School of Journalism, where Marcotte
is a visiting professor. Collaborating on the invitation only, online survey
was PhD candidate Sandra Evans of The Annenberg School of Communication at the
University of Southern California. 136 stations participated.

About the Author

Michael V. Marcotte is the 2012-2013 Reynolds
Chair in Ethics of Innovative and Entrepreneurial Journalism at the University
of Nevada, Reno. He is a 2011 Knight Fellow of Stanford University. For 20
years, Marcotte served as a public broadcasting news executive in Seattle and
San Diego. Now based in Albuquerque, he runs a consultancy for public media advancement.